Statistiken durchsuchen:

KEMÖ/Journalliste durchsuchen:

Normale Ansicht MARC ISBD

Verzögerter Aufschwung im Westen : [MPE] : Die Wirtschaft in den Bundesländern 1994

Von: Krajasits, Cornelia | Geldner, Norbert | Palme, Gerhard | Mayerhofer, Peter.
Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
Verlag: 1995Einheitssachtitel: Lagged Upturn in Western Regions. Economic Developments in the Austrian Federal States in 1994 Schlagwörter: WifoOnline-Ressourcen: ONLINE INTERN
Inhalte:
Mit dem Konjunkturaufschwung nahmen die regionalen Disparitäten der Wirtschaft sentwicklung zu. In wichtigen Bereichen der Exportwirtschaft wirkten Kräfte, d ie den Osten Österreichs begünstigten. Durch eine ungleichmäßige Entwicklung in Sektoren mit hohem Gewicht der Inlandsnachfrage wurden jedoch großräumige T endenzen überdeckt. Dank der Impulse der Transformation in Ost-Mitteleuropa e rholte sich die Industrie der Ostregion rascher als im Westen Österreichs (aus genommen Salzburg). Die Baukonjunktur verlief regional sehr uneinheitlich: Ei nem Boom in Vorarlberg, Salzburg, Kärnten und dem Burgenland stand ein realer Umsatzrückgang in Tirol, Oberösterreich und Wien gegenüber. Von der Krise der Tourismuswirtschaft blieb das internationale Städtereiseziel Wien ausgenommen , sie traf intensive Fremdenverkehrsregionen in Kärnten und den westlichen Bu ndesländern besonders. In 1994, the Austrian economy recovered from recession; real GDP in the non-agricultural sector expanded by 2.7 percent. Within the general pattern of the upswing, regional disparities of the business cycle bec ame more marked. Between the leaders of growth in the East, the Burgenland an d Lower Austria, on the one hand, and the Tyrol with the slowest growth, on th e other, the gap was almost 5 percentage points. Within each of the three larg e Austrian regions, developments were rather uneven reflecting different tren ds in mainly domestically-oriented sectors like construction, trade and busine ss services. In the East, the upturn lagged behind in the Vienna region; in t he West, the economies of Upper Austria and Vorarlberg performed above the nat ional average. Manufacturing industry in the eastern region benefited from pro gress in the transformation process of East-Central European countries. In wes tern Austria, demand from Germany provided rather less stimulus than in previo us recoveries. The slowly expanding Vorarlberg industry has still to overcome problems of structural adjustment related to the apparel sector. The construc tion sector exhibited large regional disparities, with output rising strongly in Vorarlberg, Salzburg, Carinthia and Burgenland, while falling in other reg ions, notably in the Tyrol, Upper Austria and Vienna. The crisis in the touris m industry hit particularly the areas highly specializing in tourism services, such as Carinthia and the western states of Tyrol, Salzburg and Vorarlberg. City tourism fared clearly better, so that overnight stays in Vienna rose by o ver 5 percent. The Austrian labor market reacted only with a lag to the busine ss cycle recovery. Employment in the Burgenland, in Lower Austria and Salzburg increased by more than 1 percent, while it stagnated in Vorarlberg, Styria an d Vienna. Unemployment fell most markedly in Salzburg and Upper Austria, whil e in the Tyrol it continued rising somewhat. The level of unemployment is, by tradition, higher in the East than in the western regions. In 1994, Styria and Carinthia registered the highest unemployment rates of 8.1 percent, respecti vely; Burgenland (7.7 percent) and Vienna (7.1 percent) were also above the na tional average; the lowest unemployment rate held Salzburg with 4.0 percent.
In: WIFO-Monatsberichte 1995, 68(5), S. 314-328Zusammenfassung: Mit dem Konjunkturaufschwung nahmen die regionalen Disparitäten der Wirtschaftsentwicklung zu. In wichtigen Bereichen der Exportwirtschaft wirkten Kräfte, die den Osten Österreichs begünstigten. Durch eine ungleichmäßige Entwicklung in Sektoren mit hohem Gewicht der Inlandsnachfrage wurden jedoch großräumige Tendenzen überdeckt. Dank der Impulse der Transformation in Ost-Mitteleuropa erholte sich die Industrie der Ostregion rascher als im Westen Österreichs (ausgenommen Salzburg). Die Baukonjunktur verlief regional sehr uneinheitlich: Einem Boom in Vorarlberg, Salzburg, Kärnten und dem Burgenland stand ein realer Umsatzrückgang in Tirol, Oberösterreich und Wien gegenüber. Von der Krise der Tourismuswirtschaft blieb das internationale Städtereiseziel Wien ausgenommen, sie traf intensive Fremdenverkehrsregionen in Kärnten und den westlichen Bundesländern besonders.Zusammenfassung: In 1994, the Austrian economy recovered from recession; real GDP in the non-agricultural sector expanded by 2.7 percent. Within the general pattern of the upswing, regional disparities of the business cycle became more marked. Between the leaders of growth in the East, the Burgenland and Lower Austria, on the one hand, and the Tyrol with the slowest growth, on the other, the gap was almost 5 percentage points. Within each of the three large Austrian regions, developments were rather uneven reflecting different trends in mainly domestically-oriented sectors like construction, trade and business services. In the East, the upturn lagged behind in the Vienna region; in the West, the economies of Upper Austria and Vorarlberg performed above the national average. Manufacturing industry in the eastern region benefited from progress in the transformation process of East-Central European countries. In western Austria, demand from Germany provided rather less stimulus than in previous recoveries. The slowly expanding Vorarlberg industry has still to overcome problems of structural adjustment related to the apparel sector. The construction sector exhibited large regional disparities, with output rising strongly in Vorarlberg, Salzburg, Carinthia and Burgenland, while falling in other regions, notably in the Tyrol, Upper Austria and Vienna. The crisis in the tourism industry hit particularly the areas highly specializing in tourism services, such as Carinthia and the western states of Tyrol, Salzburg and Vorarlberg. City tourism fared clearly better, so that overnight stays in Vienna rose by over 5 percent. The Austrian labor market reacted only with a lag to the business cycle recovery. Employment in the Burgenland, in Lower Austria and Salzburg increased by more than 1 percent, while it stagnated in Vorarlberg, Styria and Vienna. Unemployment fell most markedly in Salzburg and Upper Austria, while in the Tyrol it continued rising somewhat. The level of unemployment is, by tradition, higher in the East than in the western regions. In 1994, Styria and Carinthia registered the highest unemployment rates of 8.1 percent, respectively; Burgenland (7.7 percent) and Vienna (7.1 percent) were also above the national average; the lowest unemployment rate held Salzburg with 4.0 percent.
Tags dieser Bibliothek: Es gibt keine Tags für diesen Titel. Einloggen, um Tags hinzuzufügen.
Exemplare
Medientyp Aktuelle Bibliothek Sammlung Signatur Jahrgang/Heft Status Fälligkeitsdatum Barcode
WIFO Monatsbericht WIFO Electronic Resource WIFO Publikation Electronic Access Verfügbar ebk00003487

Mit dem Konjunkturaufschwung nahmen die regionalen Disparitäten der Wirtschaft sentwicklung zu. In wichtigen Bereichen der Exportwirtschaft wirkten Kräfte, d ie den Osten Österreichs begünstigten. Durch eine ungleichmäßige Entwicklung in Sektoren mit hohem Gewicht der Inlandsnachfrage wurden jedoch großräumige T endenzen überdeckt. Dank der Impulse der Transformation in Ost-Mitteleuropa e rholte sich die Industrie der Ostregion rascher als im Westen Österreichs (aus genommen Salzburg). Die Baukonjunktur verlief regional sehr uneinheitlich: Ei nem Boom in Vorarlberg, Salzburg, Kärnten und dem Burgenland stand ein realer Umsatzrückgang in Tirol, Oberösterreich und Wien gegenüber. Von der Krise der Tourismuswirtschaft blieb das internationale Städtereiseziel Wien ausgenommen , sie traf intensive Fremdenverkehrsregionen in Kärnten und den westlichen Bu ndesländern besonders. In 1994, the Austrian economy recovered from recession; real GDP in the non-agricultural sector expanded by 2.7 percent. Within the general pattern of the upswing, regional disparities of the business cycle bec ame more marked. Between the leaders of growth in the East, the Burgenland an d Lower Austria, on the one hand, and the Tyrol with the slowest growth, on th e other, the gap was almost 5 percentage points. Within each of the three larg e Austrian regions, developments were rather uneven reflecting different tren ds in mainly domestically-oriented sectors like construction, trade and busine ss services. In the East, the upturn lagged behind in the Vienna region; in t he West, the economies of Upper Austria and Vorarlberg performed above the nat ional average. Manufacturing industry in the eastern region benefited from pro gress in the transformation process of East-Central European countries. In wes tern Austria, demand from Germany provided rather less stimulus than in previo us recoveries. The slowly expanding Vorarlberg industry has still to overcome problems of structural adjustment related to the apparel sector. The construc tion sector exhibited large regional disparities, with output rising strongly in Vorarlberg, Salzburg, Carinthia and Burgenland, while falling in other reg ions, notably in the Tyrol, Upper Austria and Vienna. The crisis in the touris m industry hit particularly the areas highly specializing in tourism services, such as Carinthia and the western states of Tyrol, Salzburg and Vorarlberg. City tourism fared clearly better, so that overnight stays in Vienna rose by o ver 5 percent. The Austrian labor market reacted only with a lag to the busine ss cycle recovery. Employment in the Burgenland, in Lower Austria and Salzburg increased by more than 1 percent, while it stagnated in Vorarlberg, Styria an d Vienna. Unemployment fell most markedly in Salzburg and Upper Austria, whil e in the Tyrol it continued rising somewhat. The level of unemployment is, by tradition, higher in the East than in the western regions. In 1994, Styria and Carinthia registered the highest unemployment rates of 8.1 percent, respecti vely; Burgenland (7.7 percent) and Vienna (7.1 percent) were also above the na tional average; the lowest unemployment rate held Salzburg with 4.0 percent.

Mit dem Konjunkturaufschwung nahmen die regionalen Disparitäten der Wirtschaftsentwicklung zu. In wichtigen Bereichen der Exportwirtschaft wirkten Kräfte, die den Osten Österreichs begünstigten. Durch eine ungleichmäßige Entwicklung in Sektoren mit hohem Gewicht der Inlandsnachfrage wurden jedoch großräumige Tendenzen überdeckt. Dank der Impulse der Transformation in Ost-Mitteleuropa erholte sich die Industrie der Ostregion rascher als im Westen Österreichs (ausgenommen Salzburg). Die Baukonjunktur verlief regional sehr uneinheitlich: Einem Boom in Vorarlberg, Salzburg, Kärnten und dem Burgenland stand ein realer Umsatzrückgang in Tirol, Oberösterreich und Wien gegenüber. Von der Krise der Tourismuswirtschaft blieb das internationale Städtereiseziel Wien ausgenommen, sie traf intensive Fremdenverkehrsregionen in Kärnten und den westlichen Bundesländern besonders.

In 1994, the Austrian economy recovered from recession; real GDP in the non-agricultural sector expanded by 2.7 percent. Within the general pattern of the upswing, regional disparities of the business cycle became more marked. Between the leaders of growth in the East, the Burgenland and Lower Austria, on the one hand, and the Tyrol with the slowest growth, on the other, the gap was almost 5 percentage points. Within each of the three large Austrian regions, developments were rather uneven reflecting different trends in mainly domestically-oriented sectors like construction, trade and business services. In the East, the upturn lagged behind in the Vienna region; in the West, the economies of Upper Austria and Vorarlberg performed above the national average. Manufacturing industry in the eastern region benefited from progress in the transformation process of East-Central European countries. In western Austria, demand from Germany provided rather less stimulus than in previous recoveries. The slowly expanding Vorarlberg industry has still to overcome problems of structural adjustment related to the apparel sector. The construction sector exhibited large regional disparities, with output rising strongly in Vorarlberg, Salzburg, Carinthia and Burgenland, while falling in other regions, notably in the Tyrol, Upper Austria and Vienna. The crisis in the tourism industry hit particularly the areas highly specializing in tourism services, such as Carinthia and the western states of Tyrol, Salzburg and Vorarlberg. City tourism fared clearly better, so that overnight stays in Vienna rose by over 5 percent. The Austrian labor market reacted only with a lag to the business cycle recovery. Employment in the Burgenland, in Lower Austria and Salzburg increased by more than 1 percent, while it stagnated in Vorarlberg, Styria and Vienna. Unemployment fell most markedly in Salzburg and Upper Austria, while in the Tyrol it continued rising somewhat. The level of unemployment is, by tradition, higher in the East than in the western regions. In 1994, Styria and Carinthia registered the highest unemployment rates of 8.1 percent, respectively; Burgenland (7.7 percent) and Vienna (7.1 percent) were also above the national average; the lowest unemployment rate held Salzburg with 4.0 percent.

XIVA

VIIIA

Es gibt keine Kommentare für diesen Titel.

um einen Kommentar hinzuzufügen.

Powered by Koha